Fiona Ganz vs Alisa Baranovska Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When analyzing second serve performance over the past six months, Ganz has won 45.54% of points, outperforming Baranovska's 36.63%. Could this give Ganz an edge in service games? Yes, especially considering its correlation with match prediction accuracy.
• In return game stats, Baranovska has a slight advantage, winning 47.19% of second serve return points compared to Ganz's 44.96%. Does this suggest Baranovska might gain the upper hand in return games? Possibly, as she also leads in first serve return points.
• Ganz seems to handle pressure more effectively, saving 47.92% of breakpoints, while Baranovska has a lower save rate of 38.78%. How might this impact match outcomes? Ganz's resilience under pressure could be pivotal.
• Looking at overall performance, Baranovska has a better win rate over the last year, securing 62.96% of matches, while Ganz's win percentage is lower at 46.94%. Does Baranovska’s superior performance suggest she’s the favorite? It indicates a stronger year for her.
• Surface preferences reveal Ganz performs best on Hard courts, winning 55% of matches, whereas Baranovska excels on I.hard surfaces with a 75% win rate. How might surfaces influence this matchup? If the match is on Hard court, it slightly favors Ganz.
• Both players face similar levels of competition, with average opponent rankings around 445. Do they play at a comparable level? Yes, their competition is closely matched.
• In final set scenarios, Baranovska shines, winning 83% of deciding sets compared to Ganz's 54%. Who would likely thrive in a tight match? Baranovska’s record suggests she’d be more clutch in a deciding set.
• Ganz has converted 45.95% of breakpoints recently, whereas Baranovska trails with 34.78%. Is Ganz more effective at capitalizing on breakpoint chances? Yes, indicating more aggressive play.

Editorial Prediction (May 13, 2025, UTC):

This upcoming clash between Ganz and Baranovska promises to be a compelling encounter. Ganz's strengths appear in her second serve performance and her ability to handle pressure effectively, evidenced by her superior breakpoint save and conversion rates.

Conversely, Baranovska's stronger overall performance last year and her excellence in deciding sets provide a formidable challenge. Moreover, her successful track record in I.hard surfaces could play a significant role if the match is on a similar surface.

Despite Ganz's strengths, Baranovska’s higher win rate, return game advantage, and superior performance in tight scenarios make her the more likely victor in this close matchup. Therefore, based on these facts, Baranovska is most likely to win the upcoming tennis match.